Worldwide mock exam sittings
Sit mocks.
Get real feedback.
Timed sittings with students worldwide - AI marking and cohort rankings designed by oxford students.
Catalog
Upcoming mocks
Register now — the sitting will open on the dates below. Use the bell for email updates.
TMUA Mock — 1–2 August
In recent admissions cycles, the TMUA has been widely perceived by candidates as more demanding than many of the publicly available historic papers. Although the official content specification and general style of questioning remain unchanged, recent candidates have frequently reported a greater emphasis on unfamiliar problem-solving, less immediately apparent solution methods and sustained mathematical reasoning under significant time pressure. The interpretation of TMUA scores has also changed. Under the 2023 scoring system, approximately one-third of candidates achieved an overall score above 6.5. Under the current scale, a typical candidate scores around 4.5, while approximately 10% achieve a score above 7.0. Therefore, scores obtained on older papers cannot always be compared directly with scores awarded under the current system. This mock examination has been designed with these developments in mind. It aims to reproduce the increased problem-solving intensity, tighter time constraints and less predictable progression of difficulty associated with recent TMUA sittings, while remaining fully within the official specification. Candidates should therefore treat the paper as an opportunity to practise selecting efficient methods, adapting to unfamiliar questions and maintaining accuracy under realistic examination conditions. Full TMUA sitting matching the current UAT-UK format: Paper 1 Applications of Mathematical Knowledge (20 MCQs, 75 min) then Paper 2 Mathematical Reasoning (20 MCQs, 75 min). No calculator. No negative marking.
UCAT Mock — 1–2 August
Since 2025 the UCAT has run without Abstract Reasoning. Cognitive scoring is now out of 2700 (Verbal Reasoning, Decision Making and Quantitative Reasoning, each 300–900), with Situational Judgement reported separately as Bands 1–4. Older totals out of 3600 — and many cut-offs quoted from earlier cycles — therefore cannot be compared directly with current results. What matters is your percentile standing on the present three-subtest scale. Candidate discussion on forums such as The Student Room consistently singles out Verbal Reasoning as the section that feels hardest under exam conditions: dense passages, ~30 seconds per question, and little room to re-read. Decision Making has grown in weight after the format change (more items and more time than pre-2025), and candidates frequently report that syllogisms, logical puzzles and probabilistic items reward practised technique rather than intuition. Quantitative Reasoning remains the highest-scoring subtest on average, yet still punishes slow calculator use and weak pacing. Situational Judgement continues to matter for shortlisting — many medical schools treat Band 4 as a hard reject. Official 2025 Consortium statistics (41,354 candidates) give a useful benchmark for interpreting practice: mean cognitive score 1891; roughly the middle of the field around 1880 (5th decile); and about 2220 required to reach the top 10% (9th decile). Mean subtest scores were VR 602, DM 628 and QR 661. On SJT, roughly one in five candidates achieved Band 1, while around 10% were placed in Band 4. This mock has been written for the current Consortium exam, not retired five-section practice banks. It mirrors the present subtest order, timings and pressure profile — including the VR time crunch, DM item styles that recent cohorts emphasise, QR under paced conditions, and SJT judgements aligned with how universities actually use bands. Use it to rehearse skipping strategy, method selection under the clock, and calm decision-making when a question type is unfamiliar. Full UCAT sitting (Abstract Reasoning removed): Verbal Reasoning 44 Q / 22 min, Decision Making 35 Q / 37 min, Quantitative Reasoning 36 Q / 26 min, Situational Judgement 69 Q / 26 min. 184 questions; 111 minutes answering time (plus ~6.5 min timed instruction screens in the real test).
How it works
From registration to results
Step 01
Register & prepare
Choose your subject, register for a sitting window, and review the exam format before the day.
Step 02
Sit under timed conditions
Enter the exam hall for structured prep, exam, and upload phases — just like the real thing.
Step 03
Get AI feedback
Upload your completed script and receive per-question marking with detailed feedback within minutes.
Step 04
See your cohort rank
When the window closes, official grades and nationwide percentile rankings are released.